top of page
Search

![Partridge v Crittenden [1968] 2 All ER 421](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/8b459b_69781e5bb7b24d70a543a8342ce44cdd~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_292,h_219,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_avif,quality_auto/8b459b_69781e5bb7b24d70a543a8342ce44cdd~mv2.webp)
Partridge v Crittenden [1968] 2 All ER 421
This is a case on whether an advertisement in a newspaper constitutes an offer. Facts of the Case The appellant (Partridge) inserted an...
JX GOH
Jul 6, 20203 min read
148
0

![Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd [1953] 1 All ER 482](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/8b459b_5bb7cf6cd2b148a588d7eea9d75eba17~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_292,h_219,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_avif,quality_auto/8b459b_5bb7cf6cd2b148a588d7eea9d75eba17~mv2.webp)
Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd [1953] 1 All ER 482
This is a case which upheld the legal concept of an invitation to treat. Facts of the Case The defendants carried business in the retail...
JX GOH
Jul 2, 20202 min read
50
0

![Preston Corp Sdn Bhd v Edward Leong & Ors [1982] 2 MLJ 22](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/8b459b_4aac767484e8439d9967485d6c91e984~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_292,h_219,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_avif,quality_auto/8b459b_4aac767484e8439d9967485d6c91e984~mv2.webp)
Preston Corp Sdn Bhd v Edward Leong & Ors [1982] 2 MLJ 22
This is a case which defines what is an offer. Facts of the Case The appellants are a company carrying on the business of publishing...
JX GOH
Jul 1, 20204 min read
10,308
0

![Lay Hong Food Corporation Sdn Bhd v Tiong Nam Logistics Solutions Sdn Bhd [2017] 10 CLJ 680](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/8b459b_fe0517c3444047aa80799fff8124a36f~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_292,h_219,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_avif,quality_auto/8b459b_fe0517c3444047aa80799fff8124a36f~mv2.webp)
Lay Hong Food Corporation Sdn Bhd v Tiong Nam Logistics Solutions Sdn Bhd [2017] 10 CLJ 680
This is a Court of Appeal case on the requirement of an acknowledgement of debt under s.27 of the Limitation Act 1953 Facts of the Case...
JX GOH
Jun 25, 20207 min read
60
0

![National Company for Foreign Trade v Kayu Raya Sdn Bhd [1984] 2 MLJ 300](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/8b459b_718d74778eb74d2095354cdf59044fb8~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_292,h_219,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_avif,quality_auto/8b459b_718d74778eb74d2095354cdf59044fb8~mv2.webp)
National Company for Foreign Trade v Kayu Raya Sdn Bhd [1984] 2 MLJ 300
This is a case on Summary Judgment. Facts of the Case The appellant, National Company for Foreign Trade is a state trading entity of...
JX GOH
Jun 19, 20204 min read
845
0

![Cempaka Finance Bhd v Ho Lai Ying (trading as KH Trading) & Anor [2006] 2 MLJ 685](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/8b459b_25a91ad5b9094a388d2598da2ab7f535~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_292,h_219,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_avif,quality_auto/8b459b_25a91ad5b9094a388d2598da2ab7f535~mv2.webp)
Cempaka Finance Bhd v Ho Lai Ying (trading as KH Trading) & Anor [2006] 2 MLJ 685
This is a Federal Court case on the nature of a certificate of indebtedness. Facts of the Case Under a loan agreement dated 17.07.1996,...
JX GOH
Jun 18, 20203 min read
292
0

![Bank Negara Malaysia v Mohd Ismail & Ors [1992] 1 MLJ 400](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/8b459b_b57a2657f0c044a08998d2c05478be66~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_292,h_219,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_avif,quality_auto/8b459b_b57a2657f0c044a08998d2c05478be66~mv2.webp)
Bank Negara Malaysia v Mohd Ismail & Ors [1992] 1 MLJ 400
This case laid down the requirements for a summary judgment. Facts of the Case The first Respondent (Mohd Ismail) had entered into a...
JX GOH
Jun 15, 20203 min read
1,591
0

![Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] A.C. 562](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/8b459b_67f9f78ff053486a997f3afa86bb9c71~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_292,h_219,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_avif,quality_auto/8b459b_67f9f78ff053486a997f3afa86bb9c71~mv2.webp)
Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] A.C. 562
This case established the neighbour principle or test in tort law. Facts of the Case The Appellant, Mrs Donoghue visited her friend who...
JX GOH
Jun 10, 20203 min read
107
0
![Malayan Banking Bhd v Foo See Moi [1981] 2 MLJ 17](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/8b459b_701b8b22c98044fbaa16fdba05653a5e~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_292,h_219,fp_0.50_0.50,q_95,enc_avif,quality_auto/8b459b_701b8b22c98044fbaa16fdba05653a5e~mv2.webp)
Malayan Banking Bhd v Foo See Moi [1981] 2 MLJ 17
This is a Federal Court Landmark case on the admissibility of a without prejudice letter. Facts of the Case The Appellant (Malayan...
JX GOH
Jun 4, 20202 min read
216
0

![Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company [1893] 1 Q.B. 256](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/8b459b_a79b5c1a052146f3bb2a3d62d1b3e826~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_292,h_219,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_avif,quality_auto/8b459b_a79b5c1a052146f3bb2a3d62d1b3e826~mv2.webp)
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company [1893] 1 Q.B. 256
This is a well known common law case in Contract Law. Facts of the case The Defendant, Carbolic Smoke Ball Company is a company which...
JX GOH
Jun 1, 20202 min read
182
0
bottom of page