top of page
Search

![Saw Gaik Beow v Cheong Yew Weng & Ors [1989] 3 MLJ 301](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/8b459b_0b1ff71b41a543388aae6f95c24d5178~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_292,h_219,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_auto/8b459b_0b1ff71b41a543388aae6f95c24d5178~mv2.webp)
JX GOH
Oct 27, 202010 min read
Saw Gaik Beow v Cheong Yew Weng & Ors [1989] 3 MLJ 301
This case illustrates the situation where the first defendant had failed to prove that the he was under plaintiff’s undue influence....
1,864
0

![Mayban Finance Bhd v Liew Ek Chiu & Ors [1998] 1 CLJ 56](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/8b459b_cadd8082edaf447cb1e3ded32726cf3e~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_292,h_219,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_auto/8b459b_cadd8082edaf447cb1e3ded32726cf3e~mv2.webp)
JX GOH
Oct 21, 20206 min read
Mayban Finance Bhd v Liew Ek Chiu & Ors [1998] 1 CLJ 56
This case illustrates the situation where the wife failed to prove that undue influence has been exerted by her husband as alleged. Facts...
1,134
0

JX GOH
Oct 15, 20205 min read
Wong Hon Leong David v Noorazman bin Adnan (1995) 3 MLJ 283
This case illustrates that an exchange of mutual promises although it is executory consideration, is a good consideration. Facts of the...
1,759
0


JX GOH
Oct 12, 20205 min read
Brogden v Metropolitan Railway Company (1877) 2 App.Cas. 666
This case established that a contract can be accepted by the conduct of the parties. Facts of the Case The Appellants (Brogden & Co.)...
530
0

![Innab Salil & Ors v Verve Suites Mont Kiara Management Corporation [2020] 10 CLJ 285](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/8b459b_ca7b9fd579514a2d9a84b6dba762f453~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_292,h_219,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_auto/8b459b_ca7b9fd579514a2d9a84b6dba762f453~mv2.webp)
JX GOH
Oct 7, 202013 min read
Innab Salil & Ors v Verve Suites Mont Kiara Management Corporation [2020] 10 CLJ 285
This is a summary of the Federal Court judgment dated 5 October 2020 which holds management corporations of a residential strata building...
576
0

JX GOH
Oct 5, 20202 min read
Adams v Lindsell (1818) 106 ER 250
This case established the rule for acceptance of an offer in postal rule. Facts of the Case The plaintiffs were woollen manufacturers...
356
0

![Felthouse v Bindley [1862] 142 ER 1037](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/8b459b_9751040aa41d472fbe38b621c07dfaf6~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_292,h_219,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_auto/8b459b_9751040aa41d472fbe38b621c07dfaf6~mv2.webp)
JX GOH
Oct 3, 20202 min read
Felthouse v Bindley [1862] 142 ER 1037
This is a leading case which illustrate the principle that silence cannot amount to acceptance. Facts of the Case The plaintiff,...
66
0

![Melewar Leisure Sdn Bhd v Danaharta Managers Sdn Bhd [2010] 6 MLJ 317](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/8b459b_56a9bd0534674b50b041838f41a6be56~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_292,h_219,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_auto/8b459b_56a9bd0534674b50b041838f41a6be56~mv2.webp)
JX GOH
Sep 2, 20205 min read
Melewar Leisure Sdn Bhd v Danaharta Managers Sdn Bhd [2010] 6 MLJ 317
This is a Court of Appeal case which illustrate the situation where the defendant failed to raise any triable issues to dismiss the...
125
0

![Loganathan Maniam v Murphy Sarawak Oil Co Ltd [2020] 2 ILR 275](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/8b459b_5ad59c83321f4fc79107e8ed9f540abd~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_292,h_219,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_auto/8b459b_5ad59c83321f4fc79107e8ed9f540abd~mv2.webp)
JX GOH
Aug 18, 20207 min read
Loganathan Maniam v Murphy Sarawak Oil Co Ltd [2020] 2 ILR 275
This is a case regarding a dismissal of an employee because of misconduct in the workplace. Facts of the Case The claimant had been...
1,741
0

![Peguam Negara Malaysia v. Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd & Anor [2020] 1 LNS 338](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/8b459b_08820c31cdb849e6a7ee374400f6196c~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_292,h_219,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_auto/8b459b_08820c31cdb849e6a7ee374400f6196c~mv2.webp)
JX GOH
Aug 11, 20202 min read
Peguam Negara Malaysia v. Mkini Dotcom Sdn Bhd & Anor [2020] 1 LNS 338
This is the summary for the grounds of judgment for Malaysiakini’s application to set aside the contempt proceedings relates to comments...
251
0

![Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corporation [1955] 2 All ER 493](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/8b459b_21a6806bdca7479686510a1b28f14188~mv2.jpg/v1/fill/w_292,h_219,fp_0.50_0.50,q_90,enc_auto/8b459b_21a6806bdca7479686510a1b28f14188~mv2.webp)
JX GOH
Aug 3, 20203 min read
Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corporation [1955] 2 All ER 493
This is a Common law case on the rule of instantaneous communications in Contracts. Facts of the Case The plaintiffs, Entores Ltd are a...
497
0
![Government of Malaysia v Gurcharan Singh & Ors [1971] 1 MLJ 211](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/8b459b_2fa0101b069b4055b9b41a9350263dc6~mv2.png/v1/fill/w_292,h_219,fp_0.50_0.50,q_95,enc_auto/8b459b_2fa0101b069b4055b9b41a9350263dc6~mv2.webp)
JX GOH
Jul 11, 20205 min read
Government of Malaysia v Gurcharan Singh & Ors [1971] 1 MLJ 211
This is a case on the capacity of an infant to contract Facts of the Case The plaintiff (Government of Malaysia) entered into an...
2,325
0
bottom of page